TUNDRA

Management strategies for AcineTobacter baUmannii in the UNited States: Real-world evidence and clinical outcomes associated with Sulbactam-DuRlobActam


Background

Pneumonia and bloodstream infections due to carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) are associated with poor patient outcomes and excessive healthcare costs.1 CRAB infections impact vulnerable patient populations and therapeutic options are limited. Historically, polymyxin-based combinations have been commonly employed, but two large randomized controlled trials have highlighted the unacceptably high mortality and toxicity associated with these regimens.2,3 Alternative treatment options are complicated by significant baseline rates of resistance, pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) concerns, and treatment-emergent resistance. Moreover, clinical evidence supporting their broad application for CRAB infections is lacking. Recommendations from the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) suggest treatment with at least two agents demonstrating in vitro susceptibility against CRAB.4

Recent approval of sulbactam-durlobactam (SUL-DUR) has provided new optimism for the successful treatment of CRAB infections. Indeed, SUL-DUR is the first agent to show improved patient outcomes for CRAB infections in a randomized controlled trial, yet several questions remain unanswered as this agent is introduced into clinical practice. Foremost among them is whether SUL-DUR will be effective alone or if efficacy is optimized when combined with another agent. If used in combination, the preferred combination agent remains to be defined, but may not be imipenem-cilastatin that was studied in the ATTACK trial. Combination therapy is particularly important in the context of polymicrobial infections where DUR may play a complementary role in eradicating infections caused by other β-lactamase producing Gram-negative pathogens. Other questions regarding the efficacy of SUL-DUR include how variation in CRAB molecular epidemiology impacts treatment response,5 whether severity of illness impacts decisions to use combination therapy, and how prior antibiotic exposures will impact the in vitro activity of SUL-DUR. There is a clear and pressing need to close these and other important knowledge gaps surrounding the optimal use of SUL-DUR through real-world evidence studies.

Details

TUNDRA is a prospective, multicenter, observational study seeking to understand the management of carbapenem resistant Acinetobacter baumannii pneumonia and bloodstream infections. For patients meeting criteria, EMR data will be collected, and isolates will be shipped to Pittsburgh for in vitro testing.

Progress

Sites are being screened for potential participation. Onboarding will begin soon. Stay tuned for announcements of preliminary data reports.

References:
1. Shields RK, Paterson DL, Tamma PD. Navigating Available Treatment Options for Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii-calcoaceticus Complex Infections. Clin Infect Dis 2023; 76(Suppl 2): S179-S93.
2. Paul M, Daikos GL, Durante-Mangoni E, et al. Colistin alone versus colistin plus meropenem for treatment of severe infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria: an open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Infect Dis 2018; 18(4): 391-400.
3. Kaye KS, Marchaim D, Thamlikitkul V, et al. Colistin Monotherapy versus Combination Therapy for Carbapenem-Resistant Organisms. NEJM Evid 2023; 2(1).
4. Tamma PD, Aitken SL, Bonomo RA, Mathers AJ, van Duin D, Clancy CJ. Infectious Diseases Society of America Guidance on the Treatment of AmpC beta-Lactamase-Producing Enterobacterales, Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii, and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Infections. Clin Infect Dis 2022; 74(12): 2089-114.
5. Iovleva A, Mustapha MM, Griffith MP, et al. Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii in U.S. Hospitals: Diversification of Circulating Lineages and Antimicrobial Resistance. mBio 2022; 13(2): e0275921.